{"id":3131,"date":"2021-08-04T07:10:56","date_gmt":"2021-08-04T05:10:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trellisterium.de\/?p=3131"},"modified":"2022-11-28T15:46:55","modified_gmt":"2022-11-28T13:46:55","slug":"veraendern-oder-abtreten","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trellisterium.de\/en\/veraendern-oder-abtreten\/","title":{"rendered":"Change or Die?"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

More than ever, companies are urged to deliver good things quickly, affordably, and reliably again and again. How to do that? By treating ongoing development as an important permanent task that needs to be organized.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

<\/h1>\n

\"\"<\/h1>\n

Even if sometimes a different impression is given<\/h1>\n

we usually work reasonably well and also successfully. And we do this by making our processes as smooth as possible. If problems arise, we mostly solve them by simply removing the grit from the properly maintained machine:<\/p>\n

Processes are automated, or at the very least, reengineered and, yes, often personnel are replaced or laid off. At the same time, the work is redistributed to colleagues, who in turn are trained to do the jobs well again, and preferably even better.<\/p>\n

This is how it has worked in the past. And it worked excellently.<\/p>\n

However, for some time now, it has been noticeable all around that things are no longer running quite so smoothly. <\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

So will these proven means of success also help us now?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

One might doubt it<\/h2>\n

At least if we leave it to those measures alone. For in this way, we just take into account only one, albeit important aspect of good corporate governance: that we have to handle the current business as well and as profitably as possible.<\/p>\n

But a smooth day-to-day business is just half the truth that makes us even halfway successful.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\n

To shape the future<\/h2>\n

at least as important is to provide new products, product improvements, new routines and adapted, changed structures at any time.<\/p>\n

Forgetting, ignoring or deliberately ignoring this puts the success, perhaps even the continued existence of the company at risk.<\/p>\n

Without further development, it is not only possible, but even most likely, that customers and staff (!) will become dissatisfied over time, will migrate from the medium to long term and will not return for a while.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n

This has always been true, of course.<\/h2>\n

But it is especially true in those dynamic markets that have rapidly emerged over the past digital years. It therefore cannot be overemphasized:<\/p>\n

In just about all industries, a great deal has changed very radically. And it is likely that this will continue to happen.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Unfortunately, this is precisely what our organizations, focused on stability and stable, controllable markets, are ill-equipped to deal with.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\n

\"\"But what exactly has a changed?<\/h2>\n

First of all, that customers today have many more options, which they also use. There are many more different product and offer forms and communities available to customers today than there were just a few years ago.<\/p>\n

As a result, everyone can inform him\/herself today and thus also decide more confidently what is relevant, worth consuming and experiencing for him\/her and when. And also what the service is or should be worth to her\/him.<\/p>\n

As a result, customers today make decisions much more confidently and independently of what producers and retailers communicate or suggest to them as important or valuable.<\/p>\n

It can also be said this way: Our relatively manageable markets for mass-produced goods are saying goodbye (if they still exist at all).<\/p>\n

\n

They are now being replaced by<\/h2>\n

a confusing field of the most diverse offers, products and services, in which a great many different players are active. Here, different, new value-creating rules apply.<\/p>\n

This is a rather unfamiliar business than the one we have known up to now, with which we have been successful – and according to which we still organize ourselves today.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n

“Practically minded men who fancy themselves quite free from intellectual influences are more often than not the slaves of some late economist.” John Maynard Keynes<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

\"\"<\/h2>\n

But if we want to be successful today and in the future<\/h2>\n

it is necessary to review our previous ideas about organization and how to design it, and probably to throw some of them overboard. Above all, we have to adapt without delay.<\/p>\n

Now it is necessary to learn to handle the existing business smoothly, profitably and efficiently as long as it still carries us and at the same time (!) to improve our products faster and always close to the market or to (find) completely new solutions, ie: to be innovative.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In the past, when innovation was a comparatively cozy thing, we also lost sight of this due to our quite successful hierarchical routines.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, from an organizational perspective, we therefore also have comparatively little to no practice in repeatedly recognizing larger and smaller innovative business ideas and swiftly implementing them close to the market.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n

“You may not want to upgrade, but you must because everyone else is. It’s an upgrade arms race.”<\/em>
\nKevin Kelly<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

Because of this circumstances<\/h2>\n

we very likely won’t be able to avoid learning just that: Turning our companies into learning, more flexible, self-organized organizations. This time for real. Of course, this puts completely different demands on our processes, which we have so far organized in a very hierarchical way based on the division of labor.<\/p>\n

In the future, employees, executives, management and owners will act, make decisions and assume responsibility in a different, more open, more self-organized, more self-motivated and also more self-confident way than before.<\/p>\n

Anyone hoping or waiting for this to happen in an uncoordinated, magical way at all, and then also in a good manner, is likely to be disappointed. Such a change is not a matter of course. Rather, it must be initiated and organized as a strategically important entrepreneurial task.<\/p>\n

\n

\"\"From today’s perspective<\/h2>\n

a self-organized, learning organization may seem unusual or even impossible. However, there is much to suggest that it will happen. And this is because our existing means are no longer suitable for the situations that we will encounter more and more often.<\/p>\n

In short, we simply have no choice but to change in this direction<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The good thing will be that we can thus swiftly solve one or the other current urgent organizational and also existential economic problem and at the same time learn to secure our entrepreneurial future again and again.<\/p>\n

For me, that’s good for a start, isn’t it?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Further Reading<\/h2>\n